Constructionism vs. Instructionism
Focusing his work on how students learn Seymour Papert offers two approaches to educational innovation, which include both Contructionism and Instructionism. Instructionism from what I understood focuses on direct instruction from a teacher and the formal ways in which content is taught where as Constructionismfocuses on the ‘autonomy’ of student learning through relevant computer based software. Papert argues that the computer is but only an instrument in student learning and should be only seen that way, it should be utilised to its full potential when teaching content relevant to the students’ real world development. Papert goes onto say that ‘(what you learn in) schools you can’t really use (when relating to formal mathematic classes). Another thing that’s wrong with schools is that there’s one way to do it. And that doesn’t happen in the real world either. In the real world, there are many ways to do things, and this is how creativity develops.’
Papert also says that by using a Contructionism approach to learning with computers will improve students’ ability to learn, stating that through this avenue there is a transition where information stops ‘being teachers’ knowledge and become her knowledge’.
In terms of teaching through a Constructivist approach in the Visual Arts subject there are many avenues in which to support student learning techniques. In my recent practical without oputwardly knowing it to be Constructivist approach the students were given an exercise in photoshop which is known as the ‘Floating 8 Ball’. Armed with the Photoshop program students were to create (without any exterior files) an image from scratch with online/sheet directions (which I posted on the students’ accounts). This gave the students the ‘autonomy’ to locate certain tools and use them accordingly

Students work Floating 8 Ball